Ecuador vs Ukraine: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
40
in 2013
Ukraine
40
in 2013
Ecuador rank
135th
Ukraine rank
135th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Ukraine
010203040200520092013

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 40 against 40 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 135th and Ukraine ranks 135th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 40 34.67 5.33 Ecuador
2010s 40 40 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Ukraine?
Ecuador, at 40 against 40 in Ukraine as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Ukraine?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ukraine?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Ecuador and Ukraine rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 135th and Ukraine ranks 135th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.