Dominican Republic vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 83rd and Palestine, State of ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 53.33 | 10 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 54.17 | 53.33 | 0.8334 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or Palestine, State of?
- Dominican Republic, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Palestine, State of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Palestine, State of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Dominican Republic and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 83rd and Palestine, State of ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.