Dominican Republic vs Malawi: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Dominican Republic
53.33
in 2013
Malawi
53.33
in 2013
Dominican Republic rank
83rd
Malawi rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Malawi
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Malawi, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 83rd and Malawi ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 53.33 | 10 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 54.17 | 53.33 | 0.8334 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or Malawi?
- Dominican Republic, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Malawi as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and Malawi?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Dominican Republic and Malawi rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 83rd and Malawi ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.