Denmark vs Iceland: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Denmark
63.33
in 2013
Iceland
63.33
in 2013
Denmark rank
34th
Iceland rank
34th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Iceland
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in Iceland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 34th and Iceland ranks 34th of 188 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Iceland Difference Ahead
2000s 63.33 53.33 10 Denmark
2010s 63.33 57.5 5.83 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Denmark or Iceland?
Denmark, at 63.33 against 63.33 in Iceland as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Denmark and Iceland?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iceland?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Denmark and Iceland rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Denmark ranks 34th and Iceland ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.