Czechia vs Namibia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Czechia
53.33
in 2013
Namibia
53.33
in 2013
Czechia rank
83rd
Namibia rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Czechia
- Namibia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 53.33 | 3.33 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 51.67 | 53.33 | 1.67 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Czechia or Namibia?
- Czechia, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Namibia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Czechia and Namibia?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Czechia and Namibia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Czechia ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.