Czechia vs Kuwait: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Czechia
53.33
in 2013
Kuwait
53.33
in 2013
Czechia rank
83rd
Kuwait rank
83rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Czechia
  • Kuwait
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kuwait ahead.

Czechia ranks 83rd and Kuwait ranks 83rd of 188 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 50 50 0
2010s 51.67 50.83 0.8333 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Czechia or Kuwait?
Czechia, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Kuwait as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Czechia and Kuwait?
0, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kuwait?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Czechia and Kuwait rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Czechia ranks 83rd and Kuwait ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.