China vs Kosovo: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
China
50
in 2013
Kosovo
50
in 2013
China rank
103rd
Kosovo rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Kosovo
How they compare
China currently reports 50 against 50 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Kosovo ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.67 | 42.67 | 6 | China |
| 2010s | 50 | 38.33 | 11.67 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, China or Kosovo?
- China, at 50 against 50 in Kosovo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between China and Kosovo?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kosovo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do China and Kosovo rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 103rd and Kosovo ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.