China vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
China
50
in 2013
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
50
in 2013
China rank
103rd
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
China currently reports 50 against 50 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.67 | 42.67 | 6 | China |
| 2010s | 50 | 38.33 | 11.67 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, China or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- China, at 50 against 50 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between China and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do China and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 103rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.