Chile vs Rwanda: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Chile
66.67
in 2013
Rwanda
66.67
in 2013
Chile rank
23rd
Rwanda rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.33 | 34 | 29.33 | Chile |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 64.17 | 2.5 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Chile or Rwanda?
- Chile, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Rwanda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Chile and Rwanda?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.