Central African Republic vs Ukraine: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Ukraine
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 40 against 40 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 137th and Ukraine ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 34.67 | 5.33 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Ukraine?
- Central African Republic, at 40 against 40 in Ukraine as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Ukraine?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ukraine?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Central African Republic and Ukraine rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 137th and Ukraine ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.