Cabo Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Cabo Verde
40
in 2013
Guinea-Bissau
40
in 2013
Cabo Verde rank
136th
Guinea-Bissau rank
136th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Cabo Verde
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 40 against 40 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 136th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Cabo Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
- Cabo Verde, at 40 against 40 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cabo Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Cabo Verde ranks 136th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.