Cape Verde vs Central African Republic: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Cape Verde
40
in 2013
Central African Republic
40
in 2013
Cape Verde rank
136th
Central African Republic rank
136th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 40 against 40 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 136th and Central African Republic ranks 136th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Cape Verde or Central African Republic?
- Cape Verde, at 40 against 40 in Central African Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Cape Verde and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Central African Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Cape Verde and Central African Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 136th and Central African Republic ranks 136th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.