Brunei Darussalam vs Mexico: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
56.67
in 2013
Mexico
56.67
in 2013
Brunei Darussalam rank
67th
Mexico rank
67th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Mexico
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 56.67 against 56.67 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Mexico ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 52 | 5.33 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 54.17 | 56.67 | 2.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Mexico?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 56.67 against 56.67 in Mexico as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Mexico?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Mexico?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Mexico rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Mexico ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.