Brunei Darussalam vs Madagascar: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
56.67
in 2013
Madagascar
56.67
in 2013
Brunei Darussalam rank
67th
Madagascar rank
67th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Madagascar
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 56.67 against 56.67 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Madagascar ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 56.67 | 10 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 54.17 | 56.67 | 2.5 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Madagascar?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 56.67 against 56.67 in Madagascar as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Madagascar ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.