Brazil vs Kuwait: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Brazil
53.33
in 2013
Kuwait
53.33
in 2013
Brazil rank
83rd
Kuwait rank
83rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Kuwait
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 83rd and Kuwait ranks 83rd of 188 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 53.33 50 3.33 Brazil
2010s 53.33 50.83 2.5 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Brazil or Kuwait?
Brazil, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Kuwait as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Brazil and Kuwait?
0, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kuwait?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Brazil and Kuwait rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Brazil ranks 83rd and Kuwait ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.