Botswana vs Portugal: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Botswana
60
in 2013
Portugal
60
in 2013
Botswana rank
53rd
Portugal rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Portugal
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 60 against 60 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 53rd and Portugal ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 60 | 10 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Botswana or Portugal?
- Botswana, at 60 against 60 in Portugal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Botswana and Portugal?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Portugal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Botswana and Portugal rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Botswana ranks 53rd and Portugal ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.