Botswana vs Cyprus: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Botswana
60
in 2013
Cyprus
60
in 2013
Botswana rank
53rd
Cyprus rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Cyprus
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 60 against 60 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cyprus ahead.
Botswana ranks 53rd and Cyprus ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 46.67 | 3.33 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 60 | 56.67 | 3.33 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Botswana or Cyprus?
- Botswana, at 60 against 60 in Cyprus as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Botswana and Cyprus?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cyprus?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Botswana and Cyprus rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Botswana ranks 53rd and Cyprus ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.