Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Uzbekistan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 40 against 40 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 137th and Uzbekistan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 36.67 | 3.33 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 40 | 37.5 | 2.5 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Uzbekistan?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 40 against 40 in Uzbekistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 137th and Uzbekistan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.