Belarus vs Uruguay: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Belarus
50
in 2013
Uruguay
50
in 2013
Belarus rank
103rd
Uruguay rank
103rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Uruguay
01020304050200520092013

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 50 against 50 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 42 50 8 Uruguay
2010s 48.33 50 1.67 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Belarus or Uruguay?
Belarus, at 50 against 50 in Uruguay as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Belarus and Uruguay?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Belarus ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.