Belarus vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Belarus
50
in 2013
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
50
in 2013
Belarus rank
103rd
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Belarus
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 50 against 50 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Belarus ranks 103rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42 | 42.67 | 0.6667 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 48.33 | 38.33 | 10 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Belarus or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Belarus, at 50 against 50 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Belarus and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Belarus ranks 103rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.