Austria vs Jamaica: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Austria
53.33
in 2013
Jamaica
53.33
in 2013
Austria rank
83rd
Jamaica rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- Jamaica
How they compare
Austria currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 83rd and Jamaica ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Austria or Jamaica?
- Austria, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Jamaica as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Austria and Jamaica?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Jamaica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Austria and Jamaica rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 83rd and Jamaica ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.