Australia vs Fiji: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Australia
56.67
in 2013
Fiji
56.67
in 2013
Australia rank
67th
Fiji rank
67th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Fiji
How they compare
Australia currently reports 56.67 against 56.67 in Fiji, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 67th and Fiji ranks 67th of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.67 | 56.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 56.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Australia or Fiji?
- Australia, at 56.67 against 56.67 in Fiji as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Australia and Fiji?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Fiji?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Australia and Fiji rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 67th and Fiji ranks 67th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.