Argentina vs China (People's Republic of): Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Argentina
50
in 2013
China (People's Republic of)
50
in 2013
Argentina rank
103rd
China (People's Republic of) rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Argentina
- China (People's Republic of)
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 50 against 50 in China (People's Republic of), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 103rd and China (People's Republic of) ranks 103rd of 190 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | China (People's Republic of) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 48.67 | 1.33 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Argentina or China (People's Republic of)?
- Argentina, at 50 against 50 in China (People's Republic of) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Argentina and China (People's Republic of)?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and China (People's Republic of)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Argentina and China (People's Republic of) rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 103rd and China (People's Republic of) ranks 103rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.