Austria vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Austria
58.6%
in 2018
Lithuania
58.2%
in 2018
Austria rank
25th
Lithuania rank
27th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

  • Austria
  • Lithuania
0204060200020092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 58.6% against 58.2% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.4%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lithuania ahead.

Austria ranks 25th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 47 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 58.2% 67.1% 8.9% Lithuania
2010s 59.8% 58.1% 1.8% Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Austria or Lithuania?
Austria, at 58.6% against 58.2% in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Austria and Lithuania?
0.4%, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lithuania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Austria and Lithuania rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?
Austria ranks 25th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-9/austria/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-9/austria/lithuania/">Austria vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 299 data points, 1995–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of children at the end of lower secondary education reaching at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics. A minimum proficiency level (MPL) is the benchmark of basic knowledge in a domain (mathematics, reading, etc.) measured through learning assessments. The indicator is calculated as the number of children and/or young people at the relevant stage of education n in a given year t achieving or exceeding the pre-defined proficiency level in a given subject s, expressed as a percentage of the total number of children and/or young people at stage of education n, in year t, in any proficiency level in subject s. The higher the value of the indicator, the higher the proportion of children or young adults who have acquired the minimum level of meaningful competencies. Data are calculated by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics from sources that include the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Programme for International Student Assessment for Development (PISA-D), Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), El Laboratorio Latino americano de Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación (LLECE), Programme d’analyse des systèmes éducatifs de la confemen (PASEC), Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Education Quality (SACMEQ), Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA), national assessments data collected through the Catalogue of Learning Assessments (CLA) and/or available in national reports, and population-based assessments (Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) and Early Grade Mathematics Assessment (EGMA), UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), People’s Action for Learning (PAL) NETWORK: e.g. Annual Status of Education Report (ASER), UWEZO, etc.)). For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/