How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?

5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education

Chile

0.8795 NPIA

in 2018

Lithuania

0.8944 NPIA

in 2018

Chile rank

19th

Lithuania rank

17th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time

Chile
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.8944 NPIA against 0.8795 NPIA in Chile, a difference of 0.0149 NPIA.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 44 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.9856 NPIA	0.8878 NPIA	0.0979 NPIA	Chile
2010s	0.9303 NPIA	0.9182 NPIA	0.0121 NPIA	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Chile or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 0.8944 NPIA against 0.8795 NPIA in Chile as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Chile and Lithuania?: 0.0149 NPIA, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?: Chile ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-25/chile/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-education-achieving-at-least-a-25/chile/lithuania/">Chile vs Lithuania: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)
Unit: NPIA
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 44 places, 280 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

The Adjusted Native Parity Index (NPIA) is calculated by dividing the immigrant value for the indicator by the non-immigrant value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted native parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted NPI equal to 1 indicates parity between immigrants and non-immigrants. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of non-immigrants and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of immigrants. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/