Mexico vs North Macedonia: Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption
Mexico
0.9%
in 2012
North Macedonia
0.7%
in 2008
Mexico rank
40th
North Macedonia rank
41st
Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption over time
- Mexico
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.9% against 0.7% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 40th and North Macedonia ranks 41st of 46 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 0.5% | 1.7% | Mexico |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 1.3% | 0.8% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption, Mexico or North Macedonia?
- Mexico, at 0.9% against 0.7% in North Macedonia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption between Mexico and North Macedonia?
- 0.2%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2008.
- How do Mexico and North Macedonia rank globally for proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption?
- Mexico ranks 40th and North Macedonia ranks 41st of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Health Equity and Financial Protection Indicators (HEFPI) database, World Bank, published as Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption poverty line by out-of-pocket health care expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population pushed below 60% of median consumption by out-of-pocket health spending