Kazakhstan vs Philippines: Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption
Kazakhstan
1.3%
in 2015
Philippines
1.0%
in 2015
Kazakhstan rank
35th
Philippines rank
38th
Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption over time
- Kazakhstan
- Philippines
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 1.3% against 1.0% in Philippines, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.4 times Philippines's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 38th of 46 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.4% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption, Kazakhstan or Philippines?
- Kazakhstan, at 1.3% against 1.0% in Philippines as of 2015.
- What is the difference in proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption between Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 0.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and Philippines rank globally for proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption?
- Kazakhstan ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 38th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Health Equity and Financial Protection Indicators (HEFPI) database, World Bank, published as Proportion of population pushed below the 60% median consumption poverty line by out-of-pocket health care expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population pushed below 60% of median consumption by out-of-pocket health spending