Belarus vs Kazakhstan: Proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 PPP) poverty
Belarus
0.0%
in 2016
Kazakhstan
0.0%
in 2015
Belarus rank
44th
Kazakhstan rank
42nd
Proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 PPP) poverty over time
- Belarus
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Belarus, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 44th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 46 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 ppp) poverty, Belarus or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Belarus as of 2015.
- What is the difference in proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 ppp) poverty between Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Kazakhstan rank globally for proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 ppp) poverty?
- Belarus ranks 44th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Health Equity and Financial Protection Indicators (HEFPI) database, World Bank, published as Proportion of population pushed below the $3.20 ($ 2011 PPP) poverty line by out-of-pocket health care expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population pushed below 3.20 international $ per day consumption poverty line by out-of-pocket health spending