Cambodia vs Luxembourg: Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket

Cambodia
10.9%
in 2023
Luxembourg
11.7%
in 2023
Cambodia rank
32nd
Luxembourg rank
30th

Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket over time

  • Cambodia
  • Luxembourg
05101520199820102023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 11.7% against 10.9% in Cambodia, a difference of 0.8%.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 32nd and Luxembourg ranks 30th of 71 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 12.0% 11.8% 0.2% Cambodia
2020s 10.2% 11.8% 1.6% Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket, Cambodia or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 11.7% against 10.9% in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket between Cambodia and Luxembourg?
0.8%, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Luxembourg?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Luxembourg rank globally for proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket?
Cambodia ranks 32nd and Luxembourg ranks 30th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket health expenditure, based on the societal poverty line (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Luxembourg: Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket. Statizoid, drawing on Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-further-impoverished-due-to-out-of-pocket-health-expenditure/cambodia/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-further-impoverished-due-to-out-of-pocket-health-expenditure/cambodia/luxembourg/">Cambodia vs Luxembourg: Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket health expenditure, based on the societal poverty line (%)
Unit
%
Source
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
83 places, 1,076 data points, 1985–2023
Last refreshed

Proportion of population living in households already in societal poverty (household total budget lies below the societal poverty line) that incur any out-of-pocket health expenditure. The household discretionary budget is defined as the total household budget, measured by consumption expenditure or income, minus the societal poverty line (SPL). Using 2017 purchasing power parities (PPPs), the SPL corresponds to whichever is greater: $2.15 (the international poverty line) or $1.15 + 50% of median household consumption expenditure or income, excluding out-of-pocket household expenditure on health. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).