Georgia vs Latvia: Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing)

Georgia
9.9%
in 2024
Latvia
8.4%
in 2019
Georgia rank
7th
Latvia rank
9th

Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) over time

  • Georgia
  • Latvia
24681012199720102024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 9.9% against 8.4% in Latvia, a difference of 1.5%.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.

Georgia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 9th of 78 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.8% 4.0% 1.1% Latvia
2000s 6.1% 4.7% 1.4% Georgia
2010s 9.2% 7.6% 1.7% Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing), Georgia or Latvia?
Georgia, at 9.9% against 8.4% in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) between Georgia and Latvia?
1.5%, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
17 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing)?
Georgia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 9th of 78 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) out-of-pocket health expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Latvia: Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing). Statizoid, drawing on Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-facing-large-but-non-impoverishing-out-of-pocket-health/georgia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-facing-large-but-non-impoverishing-out-of-pocket-health/georgia/latvia/">Georgia vs Latvia: Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)
Unit
%
Source
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
90 places, 1,155 data points, 1985–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of population spending more than 40% but less than 100% of household discretionary budget on out-of-pocket health expenditure (%) The discretionary budget is defined as the total household budget, measured by consumption expenditure or income, minus the societal poverty line (SPL). Using 2017 purchasing power parities (PPPs), the SPL corresponds to whichever is greater: $2.15 (the international poverty line) or $1.15 + 50% of median household consumption expenditure or income, excluding out-of-pocket household expenditure on health. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).