Latvia vs United Kingdom: Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction
Latvia
89.0%
in 2025
United Kingdom
89.0%
in 2025
Latvia rank
33rd
United Kingdom rank
33rd
Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction over time
- Latvia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 89.0% against 89.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Latvia ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 33rd of 139 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.8% | 88.7% | 48.9% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 70.1% | 88.5% | 18.4% | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 89.0% | 87.8% | 1.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction, Latvia or United Kingdom?
- Latvia, at 89.0% against 89.0% in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction between Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and United Kingdom rank globally for proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction?
- Latvia ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 33rd of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%).