Egypt vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction
Egypt
100.0%
in 2012
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2010
Egypt rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction over time
- Egypt
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.9% | 100.0% | 21.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction, Egypt or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Egypt, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction between Egypt and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Egypt and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction?
- Egypt ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Proportion of local livestock breeds at risk of extinction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%).