Laos vs Nauru: Prevalence of anemia in children
Laos
41.4
in 2019
Nauru
41.8
in 2019
Laos rank
61st
Nauru rank
60th
Prevalence of anemia in children over time
- Laos
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 41.8 against 41.4 in Laos, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 61st and Nauru ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.62 | 46.06 | 0.56 | Laos |
| 2010s | 41.76 | 44.65 | 2.89 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia in children, Laos or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 41.8 against 41.4 in Laos as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia in children between Laos and Nauru?
- 0.4, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Nauru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Laos and Nauru rank globally for prevalence of anemia in children?
- Laos ranks 61st and Nauru ranks 60th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Prevalence of anemia in children. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.