Armenia vs Santa Rosa de Cabal: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days

Armenia
112.44 Days per year
in 2024
Santa Rosa de Cabal
279.66 Days per year
in 2024
Armenia rank
1st
Santa Rosa de Cabal rank
1st

Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days over time

  • Armenia
  • Santa Rosa de Cabal
0100200300198120022024

How they compare

Santa Rosa de Cabal currently reports 279.66 Days per year against 112.44 Days per year in Armenia, a difference of 167.22 Days per year.

That makes Santa Rosa de Cabal's figure about 2.5 times Armenia's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Santa Rosa de Cabal has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 1st and Santa Rosa de Cabal ranks 1st of 2 countries.

Santa Rosa de Cabal has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Santa Rosa de Cabal Difference Ahead
1980s 158.69 Days per year 254.5 Days per year 95.8 Days per year Santa Rosa de Cabal
1990s 156.35 Days per year 262.81 Days per year 106.47 Days per year Santa Rosa de Cabal
2000s 146.81 Days per year 272.71 Days per year 125.9 Days per year Santa Rosa de Cabal
2010s 137.07 Days per year 263.6 Days per year 126.53 Days per year Santa Rosa de Cabal
2020s 127.49 Days per year 271.38 Days per year 143.89 Days per year Santa Rosa de Cabal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher precipitation - cities and fuas — extreme precipitation days, Armenia or Santa Rosa de Cabal?
Santa Rosa de Cabal, at 279.66 Days per year against 112.44 Days per year in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in precipitation - cities and fuas — extreme precipitation days between Armenia and Santa Rosa de Cabal?
167.22 Days per year, with Santa Rosa de Cabal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Santa Rosa de Cabal?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Santa Rosa de Cabal rank globally for precipitation - cities and fuas — extreme precipitation days?
Armenia ranks 1st and Santa Rosa de Cabal ranks 1st of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Santa Rosa de Cabal: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/precipitation-cities-and-fuas-extreme-precipitation-days/armenia/santa-rosa-de-cabal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/precipitation-cities-and-fuas-extreme-precipitation-days/armenia/santa-rosa-de-cabal/">Armenia vs Santa Rosa de Cabal: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Extreme precipitation days
Unit
Days per year
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,325 places, 58,300 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of total precipitation and extreme precipitation days in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and cities. Data sources and methodology The indicators use ERA5-Land data. Total precipitation is the sum of all liquid and frozen water—such as rain and snow—that reaches the Earth's surface each year. It excludes fog, dew, and any precipitation that evaporates before reaching the ground. Extreme precipitation days are defined as days with more than 20 mm of total precipitation. ERA5-Land is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (0.1 degree), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators also where national meteorological data are not available at the required scale. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Precipitations - FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org