Armenia vs Treviso: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation

Armenia
-42.09 Days per year
in 2024
Treviso
10.16 Days per year
in 2024
Armenia rank
2nd
Treviso rank
1st

Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation over time

  • Armenia
  • Treviso
-60-40-2002040198120022024

How they compare

Treviso currently reports 10.16 Days per year against -42.09 Days per year in Armenia, a difference of 52.25 Days per year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 2nd and Treviso ranks 1st of 2 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Treviso in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Treviso Difference Ahead
1980s 4.16 Days per year -1.09 Days per year 5.25 Days per year Armenia
1990s 1.81 Days per year -1.27 Days per year 3.08 Days per year Armenia
2000s -7.72 Days per year 0.8082 Days per year 8.53 Days per year Treviso
2010s -17.47 Days per year 5.11 Days per year 22.58 Days per year Treviso
2020s -27.05 Days per year 1.56 Days per year 28.6 Days per year Treviso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher precipitation - cities and fuas — change in extreme precipitation, Armenia or Treviso?
Treviso, at 10.16 Days per year against -42.09 Days per year in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in precipitation - cities and fuas — change in extreme precipitation between Armenia and Treviso?
52.25 Days per year, with Treviso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Treviso?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Treviso rank globally for precipitation - cities and fuas — change in extreme precipitation?
Armenia ranks 2nd and Treviso ranks 1st of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation days from 1981-2010 period. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Treviso: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/precipitation-cities-and-fuas-change-in-extreme-precipitation-days-from-1981-2010-period/armenia/treviso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/precipitation-cities-and-fuas-change-in-extreme-precipitation-days-from-1981-2010-period/armenia/treviso/">Armenia vs Treviso: Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Precipitation - Cities and FUAs — Change in extreme precipitation days from 1981-2010 period
Unit
Days per year
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,325 places, 58,300 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of total precipitation and extreme precipitation days in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and cities. Data sources and methodology The indicators use ERA5-Land data. Total precipitation is the sum of all liquid and frozen water—such as rain and snow—that reaches the Earth's surface each year. It excludes fog, dew, and any precipitation that evaporates before reaching the ground. Extreme precipitation days are defined as days with more than 20 mm of total precipitation. ERA5-Land is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (0.1 degree), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators also where national meteorological data are not available at the required scale. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Precipitations - FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org