Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Poverty Gap reduction (%) - Contributory Pensions -extreme poor

Kazakhstan
99.9%
in 2021
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Mongolia rank
4th

Poverty Gap reduction (%) - Contributory Pensions -extreme poor over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mongolia
020406080100200720142021

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 99.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 4th of 32 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 39.3% 90.4% 51.1% Mongolia
2010s 64.5% 96.5% 32.0% Mongolia
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poverty gap reduction (%) - contributory pensions -extreme poor, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 100.0% against 99.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in poverty gap reduction (%) - contributory pensions -extreme poor between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
0.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for poverty gap reduction (%) - contributory pensions -extreme poor?
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 4th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Poverty Gap reduction (%) - Contributory Pensions -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Poverty Gap reduction (%) - Contributory Pensions -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day)
Unit
<$2.15 a day
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
33 places, 341 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction due to Contributory Pensions programs as % of pre-transfer poverty gap