Montenegro vs Samoa: Poultry production, per unit of GDP
Montenegro
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Samoa
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Montenegro rank
154th
Samoa rank
153rd
Poultry production, per unit of GDP over time
- Montenegro
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Montenegro, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 154th and Samoa ranks 153rd of 189 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poultry production, per unit of gdp, Montenegro or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in poultry production, per unit of gdp between Montenegro and Samoa?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Samoa?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Samoa rank globally for poultry production, per unit of gdp?
- Montenegro ranks 154th and Samoa ranks 153rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poultry production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.