Which has higher poultry production, per unit of gdp, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?

Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.

What is the difference in poultry production, per unit of gdp between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?

0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry production, per unit of GDP

Angola

0 tonnes per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 tonnes per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Angola rank

126th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

125th

Poultry production, per unit of GDP over time

Angola
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 125th of 189 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
1990s	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
2000s	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
2010s	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
2020s	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	0 tonnes per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry production, per unit of gdp, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in poultry production, per unit of gdp between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Angola and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for poultry production, per unit of gdp?: Angola ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 125th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-production-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-production-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sao-tome-and-principe/">Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry production, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Poultry production, per unit of GDP
Unit: tonnes per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 10,327 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 28 September 2026

Poultry production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.