Afghanistan vs Sudan: Poultry production, per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
76th
Sudan rank
78th
Poultry production, per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Sudan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 76th and Sudan ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poultry production, per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Sudan?
- Afghanistan, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in poultry production, per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Sudan?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Sudan rank globally for poultry production, per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 76th and Sudan ranks 78th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poultry production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.