South Sudan vs Tajikistan: Poultry production, per capita
South Sudan
0.0044 tonnes per person
in 2024
Tajikistan
0.0045 tonnes per person
in 2024
South Sudan rank
123rd
Tajikistan rank
122nd
Poultry production, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 0.0045 tonnes per person against 0.0044 tonnes per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 tonnes per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 123rd and Tajikistan ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0029 tonnes per person | 0.0006 tonnes per person | 0.0023 tonnes per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.004 tonnes per person | 0.0035 tonnes per person | 0.0005 tonnes per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poultry production, per capita, South Sudan or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 0.0045 tonnes per person against 0.0044 tonnes per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in poultry production, per capita between South Sudan and Tajikistan?
- 0.0001 tonnes per person, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tajikistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Tajikistan rank globally for poultry production, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 123rd and Tajikistan ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poultry production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.