China vs Latvia: POS terminals per 100,000 adults
China
2,022
in 2015
Latvia
1,845
in 2015
China rank
25th
Latvia rank
28th
POS terminals per 100,000 adults over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 2,022 against 1,845 in Latvia, a difference of 177.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 25th and Latvia ranks 28th of 80 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pos terminals per 100,000 adults, China or Latvia?
- China, at 2,022 against 1,845 in Latvia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in pos terminals per 100,000 adults between China and Latvia?
- 177, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for pos terminals per 100,000 adults?
- China ranks 25th and Latvia ranks 28th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as POS terminals per 100,000 adults. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.