China vs Latvia: Population aged 0-14, urban
China
0.1%
in 2013
Latvia
0.1%
in 2016
China rank
87th
Latvia rank
85th
Population aged 0-14, urban over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 85th of 99 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population aged 0-14, urban, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in China as of 2016.
- What is the difference in population aged 0-14, urban between China and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for population aged 0-14, urban?
- China ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 85th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Population aged 0-14, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.