Malawi vs Mauritania: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Malawi
- Mauritania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.2596 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0046 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.
Malawi ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3496 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0.1149 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.285 standard error | 0.3382 standard error | 0.0532 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.2597 standard error | 0.2508 standard error | 0.0089 standard error | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Malawi or Mauritania?
- Malawi, at 0.2596 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Malawi and Mauritania?
- 0.0046 standard error, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Mauritania rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Malawi ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.