Libya vs Mauritania: Political Stability/No Violence
Libya
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Mauritania
0.255 standard error
in 2011
Libya rank
24th
Mauritania rank
21st
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Libya
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.255 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Libya, a difference of 0.0059 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 24th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3496 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0.1149 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.2889 standard error | 0.3382 standard error | 0.0493 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.2426 standard error | 0.2508 standard error | 0.0082 standard error | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Libya or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.255 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Libya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Libya and Mauritania?
- 0.0059 standard error, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mauritania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Libya and Mauritania rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Libya ranks 24th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.