Liberia vs Rwanda: Political Stability/No Violence
Liberia
0.2672 standard error
in 2011
Rwanda
0.2745 standard error
in 2011
Liberia rank
15th
Rwanda rank
12th
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Liberia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.2745 standard error against 0.2672 standard error in Liberia, a difference of 0.0073 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Rwanda ahead.
Liberia ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 53 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4067 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0.0578 standard error | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.3301 standard error | 0.3579 standard error | 0.0278 standard error | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.2683 standard error | 0.2743 standard error | 0.006 standard error | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Liberia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.2745 standard error against 0.2672 standard error in Liberia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Liberia and Rwanda?
- 0.0073 standard error, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Liberia and Rwanda rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Liberia ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.