Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Lesotho
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.3525 standard error against 0.3119 standard error in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0406 standard error.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd and Lesotho ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4067 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0.0578 standard error | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.3542 standard error | 0.3622 standard error | 0.008 standard error | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.3298 standard error | 0.293 standard error | 0.0368 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.3525 standard error against 0.3119 standard error in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 0.0406 standard error, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd and Lesotho ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.