Gabon vs Togo: Political Stability/No Violence

Gabon
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Togo
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Gabon rank
24th
Togo rank
24th

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Gabon
  • Togo
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.2491 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Togo, a difference of 0 standard error.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Gabon ranks 24th and Togo ranks 24th of 53 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3496 standard error 0.4067 standard error 0.0571 standard error Togo
2000s 0.28 standard error 0.3159 standard error 0.0359 standard error Togo
2010s 0.2461 standard error 0.2461 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Gabon or Togo?
Gabon, at 0.2491 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Togo as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Gabon and Togo?
0 standard error, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Togo?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Gabon and Togo rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Gabon ranks 24th and Togo ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.