Gabon vs Sudan: Political Stability/No Violence

Gabon
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Sudan
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Gabon rank
24th
Sudan rank
24th

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Gabon
  • Sudan
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.2491 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Sudan, a difference of 0 standard error.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Gabon ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 24th of 53 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3496 standard error 0.3496 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.28 standard error 0.2916 standard error 0.0116 standard error Sudan
2010s 0.2461 standard error 0.2461 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Gabon or Sudan?
Gabon, at 0.2491 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Sudan as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Gabon and Sudan?
0 standard error, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Sudan?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Gabon and Sudan rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Gabon ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.