Eswatini vs Guinea: Political Stability/No Violence
Eswatini
0.2745 standard error
in 2011
Guinea
0.2672 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini rank
12th
Guinea rank
15th
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.2745 standard error against 0.2672 standard error in Guinea, a difference of 0.0073 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 12th and Guinea ranks 15th of 53 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4645 standard error | 0.4067 standard error | 0.0578 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.3677 standard error | 0.3188 standard error | 0.0489 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.2743 standard error | 0.2683 standard error | 0.006 standard error | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Eswatini or Guinea?
- Eswatini, at 0.2745 standard error against 0.2672 standard error in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Eswatini and Guinea?
- 0.0073 standard error, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Eswatini ranks 12th and Guinea ranks 15th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.