Equatorial Guinea vs Seychelles: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Seychelles
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2835 standard error against 0.2835 standard error in Seychelles, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Seychelles ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th and Seychelles ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3844 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0.0802 standard error | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 0.3283 standard error | 0.3388 standard error | 0.0105 standard error | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 0.2845 standard error | 0.2845 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Equatorial Guinea or Seychelles?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2835 standard error against 0.2835 standard error in Seychelles as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles?
- 0 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th and Seychelles ranks 8th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.